75 pages
14,8 x 21,0, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53179/9783868934663
In the last few years research on early medieval slavery has seen an ever-growing emphasis placed on long-distance slave trading, and on the raiding practices that fed this trade. There has been relatively little link-up between this and older historiography looking at slavery in terms of labour and social history: the slaves who moved and the slaves who stayed have largely been kept in separate conversations. The increased profitability of slaving, though, should lead us to expect a rise in the internal importance of slavery as well as in slave-raiding and trading to external markets. This is what we find in many of the regions most intimately associated with the trade. There were, however, profound regional differences in the profiles and forms of engagement in slaving activities across Europe. I suggest that Joseph C. Miller’s idea of slaving as a political strategy adopted by marginal players seeking to bypass normal forms of elite competition is helpful in thinking through the logic of these different responses to the opportunities and challenges presented by the slave trade: what motivated and constrained elite choices and possibilities? And what made slaving a more viable political strategy in some regions than in others?
The Author
Alice Rio is Professor of Medieval History at King’s College London. She has written a book on slavery in early medieval Europe (Slavery After Rome, c. 500–1100 (Oxford, 2017), which this lecture updates and supplements), and a number of articles on penal enslavement, ‘half-freedom’, self-sale, debt, and corporal punishment. She has also written on early medieval law and legal practice (Legal Practice and the Written Word: Frankish Formulae, c. 500–1000 (Cambridge, 2009)), and miscellaneous articles on Frankish history. She is co-editor of the journal Past & Present.
